Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of experimental forced convection studies under constant wall temperature boundary conditions for various nanofluids

From: A comprehensive review of experimental investigations of forced convective heat transfer characteristics for various nanofluids

Researcher

Nanofluid

Method of nanofluid preparation

Particle size (nm)

Particle volume concentration

Flow regime (Range of Reynolds number)

Heat transfer enhancement mechanisms

Fotukian and Esfahany (2010a)

γ-Al2O3/water

Ultrasonic cleaning and mechanical mixing

20

0-0.2

Turbulent (5000–35000)

Dispersion of suspended nanoparticles

Heyat et al. (Heyhat et al. 2012)

Al2O3/water

Two-step

40

0.1-2

Turbulent (2500–17000)

Increasing the particle volume concentrations

Fotukian andEsfahany (2010b)

CuO/water

Ultrasonic mixing

30-50

0-0.3 %

Turbulent (5000–35000)

In presence of nanoparticles flowing in the tube, enhanced thermal energy transfer from the wall to the nanofluid

Akbaridoust et al. (2013)

CuO/ water

*EEW

68

0.1, 0.2 vol. %

Laminar (140–1000)

Higher values of particle volume fraction, greater curvature ratio (helical tube)

Ferrouillat et al. (2011)

SiO2/water

Prepared from a commercial solution

22

5–34 (wt.%)

Laminar and turbulent (200–10,000)

Increase of particle volume concentration

Anoop et al. (2012)

SiO2/water

Top-down approach

20

0.2, 0.5 and 1 (wt.%)

Laminar (2–23)

Applications of nanofluids have been explored in the literature for cooling of micro devices due to the anomalous enhancements in their thermo-physical properties as well as due to their lower susceptibility to clogging

Ashtiani et al. (2012)

*MWCNT/heat transfer oil

Electrical mixing and then ultrasonic cleaning

10-30

0, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 (wt. %)

Laminar hydrodynamically fully developed regime (lower than 1500)

Flattening tube at a constant nanoparticle weight fraction, particle volume fraction and increasing volumetric flow rate

Pakdaman et al. (2013)

*MWCNT-heat transfer oil

Ultrasonic processing

-

0, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 (wt. %)

Laminar flow in the thermal entrance region (0–2000)

Suspending nanoparticles in the base fluid enhances thermophysical properties

Heris et al. (2006)

CuO/water Al2O3/water

Ultrasonic vibration

50-60 20

0.2 – 3

Laminar (650–2050)

For low concentrations, heat transfer coefficient ratios for nanofluid to homogeneous model are close to each other but by enhancing the volume concentration, more heat transfer enhancement for Al2O3/water can be detected

Hojjat et al. (2011)

*γ- Al2O3/ CMC TiO2/CMC CuO/CMC

Ultrasonic vibration

25 10 30-50

0.1-1.5

Turbulent (8000–33000)

Peclet number and the nanoparticle concentration

Meriläinen et al. (2013)

Al2O3/water SiO2/ water MgO/water

Ultrasound processing

41-53 15–47 28-110

0.5- 4 0.5 -4 0.5-2

Turbulent (3000–10000)

Use of small sized, spherical shape and smooth particles (less than 10 nm in size)

  1. *MWCNT- Multi-walled carbon nanotubes, CMC- carboxymethyl cellulose, EEW- Electric Explosion of Wire.