Numerical analysis of side airbags deployment in out-of-position situations
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 June 2016
Accepted: 28 December 2016
Published: 18 March 2017
Side-impact collisions represent the second greatest cause of fatality in motor vehicle accidents. Side-impact airbags have been installed in recent model year vehicle due to its effectiveness in reducing passengers’ injuries and fatality rates. In meeting these requirements, simulations of folding and deploying airbags are very useful and are widely used. The paper presents a simulation method for the deploying airbags using three materials in different working conditions. Finite element analysis is primarily used to evaluate this concept. In these simulations, the gas flow is described by the conservation laws of mass, momentum, and energy. The numerical results indicate that the FE method in this paper is capable of capturing airbag deploying process accurately.
KeywordsAirbag simulations Out-of-position Crash Modeling Out-of-position
The passive safety of cars has become a very high priority issue for the automotive industry. Today, there are not only one or two airbags in a car; certain models have ten times more than that. With the increasing usage of airbags, the number of accidents where the airbag itself can cause an injury to the occupant also increases (Augenstein et al. 2003; Gabauer and Gabler 2010; Audrey et al. 2011). As is well known, safety belts are also now devices designed to provide protection to the users of vehicles during crash events, minimizing the loads necessary to adapt their movement to the movement of the car (Freesmeier and Butler 1999; Schmitt et al. 1997). In general, the seat belt is designed to restrain the occupant in the vehicle and prevent the occupant from having harsh contacts with interior surfaces of the vehicles. The airbag acts to cushion any impact with vehicle structure and has positive internal pressure, which can exert distributed restraining forces over the head and face. As a safety component of automobile, an airbag decreases occupants’ injury likelihood effectively in case of an accident (Ruff et al. 2007). These safety elements can reduce the death rates on the roads, and its protection effects have been widely approved (Crandall et al. 2001; Teru and Ishikawa 2003). With computational tools such as finite element methods designed for dynamic contact problems, crashworthiness simulations can now be used with reliable accuracy to evaluate occupant protection in various collision conditions with safety metric/parameters such as acceleration, head injury criteria, intrusion distance, intrusion velocity, and neck forces (neck injury risk or whiplash). Thus, new types of airbag products are being developed to handle different collision scenarios.
Extensive studies have shown that the airbag deployment in load cases consists of two occupant loading phases: a punch-out effect where the airbag bursts out of its container with the airbag and airbag module cover accelerating towards the occupant and a second loading phase during which the airbag is taking on its deployed shape and volume (membrane-loading effect). Bankdak et al. (2002) developed an experimental airbag test system to study airbag-occupant interactions during close proximity deployment. The results provided insight for simulating the effect of inflation energy and mass flow on target response. Bedard et al. (2002) found that while left-side (driver-side) impacts accounted for only 13.5% of all crashes, the fatality rate among these crashes was 68.3% in comparison to front impact (48.3%), right-side impact (31.3%), and rear impact (38.4%). These studies underscore the importance of occupant safety during side-impact collisions. In the last years, the current market requested to reduce the time and cost airbag development. In order to achieve this result, virtual simulations play an important role since they allow to minimize the number of experimental tests (Pei et al. 2013; Cao et al. 2014). Several simulation models of airbag were established (Wang et al. 2007). It is feasible to optimize the parameters of airbag deployment using simulation technology. Experimental and numerical studies have quantified injury risks to close-proximity occupants from deploying side airbags. These studies have focused on the prevention of the most adverse effects of airbag deployment (Duma et al. 2003). Other studies have proposed airbag characteristics to minimize particular biomechanical responses (Haland and Pipkorn 1996). In a more recent study, Marklund and Nilsson (2003) compared deformation patterns with experimental data as well as the computational costs associated with three different airbag deployment simulation methods; they concluded that the SPH method is relatively inexpensive and produces incremental deformation patterns that compare most closely to the experimental results. The process of inflation of an airbag is one of the determining factors in saving lives. The duration from the initial impact of the crash to the full inflation of an airbag is about 40 ms, and during this time, the airbag goes from being in a folded state to a fully inflated state, with a high internal pressure. After achieving this state, the airbag begins to deflate, thus providing a nice cushion for the body impacting it. Ideally, the person in the crash should come into contact with the airbag at this time. In the present study, a large volume passenger side airbag model is developed to handle different collision scenarios. The main aim is evaluate the performance of deploying of passenger side airbag using finite element methods (FEM).
Mechanical properties of the airbag
Young’s modulus (GPa)
Physical and mechanical properties of the airbag
Initial yield strength (MPa)
Young’s modulus (GPa)
Finite element model of airbag simulation
where E 1 and E 2 are the Young’s modulus in the fill and wrap directions and G 12 is the shear modulus of the fabric material. ν ij is the Poisson ratio of the material.
Materials and boundary conditions
Material properties of airbag and rigid plate used in FE simulations (Chawla et al. 2004a)
Density of fabric [g/cm3]
Young’s modulus [GPa]
Shear modulus [GPa]
Initial values used for FE simulation of the swelling of passenger airbag (Deery et al. 1999)
Universal gas constant [kg/kmol.K]
Initial pressure [Pa]
1.01 × 104
Molecular weight [kg/mol]
Added initial volume [m3]
3.33 × 10−4
Results and discussion
This document outlines the current possibilities and limitations of the simulation of the first stages of the airbag deployment. The studies presented have been performed using a commercial airbag. The results first have allowed us to show that the airbag has been modeled correctly with a proper filling of the gas flow. As a result of this, simulation has proved to be a valuable tool to be taken into account in tasks related to airbag deployment.
In conclusion, these technologies are able to be used not only as a tool to solve problems related to the airbag development but also to help us arrive at a better understanding of the factors that influence the deployment of the airbag and its aggressiveness and therefore get more efficient and safer designs.
Further testing with real-life airbags and comparison with experiments is required. It is also very important to model proper folding for airbag mesh for studying contact interaction of out-of-position users with an inflating airbag. These will be carried out in the near future.
The authors would like to acknowledge the Applied Mechanics Department (DMA) at Franche-Comté University for support of this work.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Audrey, H. D., Federic, R., Pacaux, M. P., & Herve, M. (2011). Determination of pre-impact occupant postures and analysis of consequences on injury outcome. Part: a driving simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 66–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Augenstein, J., Perdeck, E., Stratton, J., Digges, K., & Bahouth, G. (2003). Characteristics of crashes that increase the risk of serious injuries. Annual proceedings / Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 47, 561–576.Google Scholar
- Bankdak, F. A., Chan, P. C., & Lu, Z. (2002). An experimental airbag test system for the study of airbag deployment loads. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 7, 129–161.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bedard, M., Guyatt, G. H., Stones, M. J., & Hirdes, J. P. (2002). The independent contribution of driver, crash and vehicle characteristics to driver fatalities. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34, 717–727.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blundell, M., & Mahangare, M. (2006). Investigation of an advanced driver airbag out-of-position injury prediction with Madymo gas flow simulations. In Madymo User Meeting.Google Scholar
- Braver, E. R., & Kyrychenko, S. Y. (2004). Efficacy of side airbags in reducing driver deaths in driver-side collisions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159, 556–564.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cao, Y. H., Wu, Z. L., & Huang, J. S. (2014). Numerical simulation of aerodynamic interactions among helicopter rotor, fuselage, engine and body of revolution. Science China Technological Sciences, 57, 1206–1218.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chawla, A., Mukherjee, S., & Sharma, A. (2004). Mesh generation for folded airbags. Computer Aided Design and Applications., 1, 269–276.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chawla, A., Bhosale, P.V., Mukherjee, S. (2004a). Modeling of folding of passenger side airbag mesh. SAE International. 1-8Google Scholar
- Crandall, C. S., Olson, L., & Sklar, D. P. (2001). Mortality reduction with air bag and seat belt use in head-on passenger car collisions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 219–224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deery, H., Morris, A. P., Fildes, B., & Newstead, S. (1999). Airbag technology in Australian passenger cars: preliminary results from real world crash investigations. Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, 1, 121–128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duma, S. M., Boggess, B. M., Crandall, J. R., Hurwitz, S. R., Seki, K., & Aoki, T. (2003). Upper extremity interaction with a deploying side airbag: a characterization of elbow joint loading. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 417–425.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freesmeier, J. J., & Butler, P. B. (1999). Analysis of a hybrid dual-combustion-chamber solid propellant gas generator. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 15, 552–561.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gabauer, D. J., & Gabler, H. C. (2010). The effects of airbags and seatbelts on occupant injury in longitudinal barrier crashes. Journal of Safety Research, 41, 9–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haland, Y., & Pipkorn, B. (1996). A parametric study of a side airbag system to meet deflection based criteria. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 118, 412–419.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones Robert, M. (1975). Mechanics of composite materials. Hemisphere Publ. CorporationGoogle Scholar
- Lim, J-H., Park, J., Yun, Y-W., Jeong, S., Park, G. (2014). Design of an airbag system of a mid-sized automobile for pedestrian protection. Journal of Automobile Engineering, 21-33.Google Scholar
- Marklund, P. O., & Nilsson, L. (2003). Optimization of airbag inflation parameters for the minimization of out of position occupant injury. Computational Mechanics, 31, 496–504.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Pei, J., Yuan, S. Q., & Yuan, J. P. (2013). Numerical analysis of periodic flow unsteadiness in a single-blade centrifugal pump. Science China Technological Sciences, 56, 212–221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruff, C., Jost, T., & Eichberger, A. (2007). Simulation of an airbag deployment in out-of-position situations. Vehicle System Dynamics, 45, 953–967.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmitt, R. G., Butler, P., & Freesmeier, J. (1997). Performance and CO production of a non-azide airbag propellant in a pre-pressurized gas generator. Combustion Science and Technology, 122, 305–350.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teng, T. L., Chang, K. C., & Wu, C. H. (2007). Development and validation of side-impact crash and sled testing finite-element models. Vehicle System Dynamics, 45, 925–937.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teru, I., & Ishikawa, T. (2003). The effect of occupant protection by controlling airbag and seatbelt. Proceedings of the 18 th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Nagoya: NHTSA.Google Scholar
- Wang, Y. E., Yang, C. X., & Peng, K. (2007). Airbag cushion process simulation for cargo airdrop system. Journal of System Simulation, 19, 3176–3179.Google Scholar
- Wu, W. T., Hsieh, W., Huang, C. H., & Wang, C. H. (2005). Theoretical simulation of combustion and inflation processed of two-stage airbag inflators. Combustion Science and Technology, 117, 383–412.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoganandan, N., Pintar, F., Zhang, J., & Gennarelli, T. A. (2007). Lateral impact injuries with side airbag deployments—a descriptive study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 22–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar